Trending
    Subscribe
    Saturday, December 21

    Whistleblower Allegations Confirmed: Constraints on Federal Investigation into Hunter Biden Revealed

    Biden’s corruption is confirmed even by the Leftist New York Times. Now if we only had a real DOJ and AG

    In a recent report by The New York Times, whistleblower allegations regarding the constraints imposed on the federal investigation into Hunter Biden have been substantiated by a credible source. However, this crucial piece of information was buried deep within the article, requiring readers to delve into the details.

    NY Times has independently confirmed the authenticity of IRS whistleblowers‘ claims that allege Biden’s Department of Justice interfered with the probe into Hunter Biden’s taxes. In the article, NYT revealed that the IRS whistleblowers‘ testimony was “confirmed independently – Ultra MAGA – responding to President Biden’s tweet

    Chuck Ross, a reporter for the Washington Free Beacon, noted on Tuesday that the publication took 20 paragraphs before revealing the noteworthy revelation about the source who lent credibility to the claims of additional charges being blocked against President Joe Biden’s son.

    The New York Times, in its 20th paragraph, disclosed that Gary Shapley, an IRS supervisory special agent, had provided whistleblower testimony asserting that Delaware’s U.S. Attorney, David Weiss, had attempted to pursue charges in Washington, D.C. in mid-2022, only to be rejected by the top federal prosecutor in the nation’s capital.

    The report further revealed in the 21st paragraph that a similar request made to prosecutors in the Central District of California, which encompasses Los Angeles, was also rejected, according to Mr. Shapley’s testimony. Additionally, a second former IRS official, whose identity remains undisclosed, corroborated the same account to House Republicans. The New York Times independently confirmed this episode through a source familiar with the situation.

    The significance of this reporting lies in the fact that Attorney General Merrick Garland has repeatedly denied allegations of political interference in the investigation, which has thus far resulted in a plea deal for Hunter Biden on charges related to tax and gun violations. Many, including Chuck Ross, criticized The New York Times for relegating this crucial information to such a low-priority placement in the article.

    “NYT buries in the 21st paragraph that it has an independent source who confirms the two IRS whistleblowers’ claim that David Weiss said he was blocked from bringing charges against Hunter Biden in California,” Ross pointed out in a tweet.

    The House Judiciary Committee GOP’s Twitter account responded, stating, “Of course they did.”

    Jason Foster, a former investigative counsel in the Senate who founded the government watchdog group Empower Oversight, added, “They buried the lede,” expressing his disappointment with the article’s structure. Tristan Leavitt, the president of Empower Oversight and the lawyer representing Shapley, conveyed his agreement with Foster’s sentiment through a tweet featuring a pair of exclamation points.

    “The best way to read stories in the NYT or [The Washington Post] is from the bottom up,” advised David Harsanyi, a senior editor at The Federalist, suggesting that readers should start from the end of an article to fully comprehend the information presented.

    In response to the whistleblower accusations, Attorney General Merrick Garland vehemently refuted any claims of political interference.

    “He was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own,” Garland affirmed regarding Weiss. “I don’t know how it would be possible for anybody to block him from bringing a prosecution given that he has that authority.”

    Weiss recently sent a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) in which he indicated that he had been granted the “ultimate authority” in the Hunter Biden matter, including the power to initiate prosecutions, in accordance with federal law, the Principles of Federal Prosecution, and Departmental regulations. In response, Jordan penned a letter to Weiss, demanding further information on the drafting of his letter.

    The New York Times’ report confirms whistleblower allegations of constraints placed on the federal investigation into Hunter Biden. The disclosure of an independent source supporting these claims, albeit buried within the article, adds weight to the accusations. Attorney General Merrick Garland has refuted any suggestions of political interference, emphasizing the autonomy granted to U.S. Attorney David Weiss. The placement of this critical information within the article has drawn criticism, leading to calls for a thorough reading of news stories, starting from the bottom. The ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden continues to generate significant attention and debate.

    Major Points:

    • Whistleblower allegations of constraints on the federal investigation into Hunter Biden have been confirmed by an independent source, as reported by The New York Times.
    • The New York Times article buried the crucial information about the source and their confirmation, leading to criticism and accusations of burying the lead.
    • IRS supervisory special agent Gary Shapley provided whistleblower testimony, stating that Delaware’s U.S. Attorney David Weiss was blocked from pursuing charges against Hunter Biden in Washington, D.C., and California.
    • Attorney General Merrick Garland has denied allegations of political interference and emphasized that Weiss had complete authority in decision-making.
    • The controversy surrounding the investigation into Hunter Biden’s activities continues, with demands for transparency and further information from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan.

    Comments – Threads

    • Well, this seems pretty significant. Even nytimes now says they have a third person who says a criminal case against Hunter Biden was blocked from being filed in California. – Clay Travis
    • In a country with an impartial press, the Hunter Biden investigation scandal would be treated as one of the biggest presidential corruption stories in American history. Instead, it’s not even on the front page of the

    Want to know more? 

    • NY Times confirms IRS whistleblower claim about Hunter Biden. Guess how far down it gets buried – American Wire

    Party Like a Russian: TOP 10 MEMES – Whatfinger News’ Choice Clips

     

    Keep Reading

    Leave A Reply

    Sponsored