Trending
    Subscribe
    Friday, November 22

    Unveiling the True Costs: The Illusion of Widespread Electric Vehicle Adoption in Biden’s Green Agenda

    The Electric Vehicle Scam Is Being Exposed More and More Every Day…. 

    The Biden administration’s fervent pursuit of widespread electrification within two decades through a mix of government subsidies and stringent regulations is revealed to be a costly illusion at the expense of the American people. While advocates of electric vehicles (EVs) assert that they will soon outpace traditional gasoline vehicles in affordability, recent research exposes the hidden subsidies propping up the EV industry, amounting to nearly $50,000 per EV.

    The burden of this staggering subsidy does not fall solely on EV owners; rather, it is distributed among gasoline vehicle owners, taxpayers, and utility ratepayers. A significant portion of the support for EVs comes in the form of regulatory credits and fuel economy standards, averaging $27,881 per vehicle. The manipulation of these standards, including an unlawful 6.67 multiplier for EVs, skews the perceived efficiency of electric vehicles and sets unrealistic goals for the adoption of all-electric cars by 2032.

    Contrary to the straightforward pricing at the gas pump for gasoline vehicles, charging an EV involves additional costs. EVs necessitate new charging infrastructure, and the substantial power draw strains existing electricity infrastructure. The research underscores that a typical overnight home charge consumes as much power as several homes, while a fast-charging station’s 30-minute session matches the power consumption of a small to medium-sized grocery store. Scaling up EV adoption would demand costly grid upgrades, and the resultant increased electricity costs, averaging $11,833 per vehicle over a decade, are currently shared among all utility customers.

    Direct federal and state subsidies further contribute an additional $8,984 per vehicle over a decade, funded by the American taxpayer. President Biden’s ambitious green agenda, aimed at combating climate change, ironically imposes a hefty financial burden on citizens without delivering commensurate environmental benefits.

    Despite claims that EV mandates are crucial for addressing climate change, the actual impact on global emissions and climate is marginal. Even if EVs manage to offset all U.S. passenger car carbon emissions, it would only constitute a 20% reduction in U.S. carbon emissions. Furthermore, the difficulty in accurately measuring an individual EV’s emissions, combined with the fossil fuel-intensive production of EV batteries, raises questions about their environmental efficacy.

    How to Explain That Electric Cars Cost More to Run Than Petrol Cars – Daily Sceptic

    A study by Volvo indicates that the lifetime emissions of an electric SUV are only a third less than its gasoline counterpart, even when charged on a carbon-light European grid. The broader conclusion is that without substantial reductions in carbon emissions from the electric grid, EVs may continue to contribute significantly to carbon emissions.

    Contrary to claims, the push for all-electric vehicles dismisses more pragmatic alternatives, such as hybrids, which could achieve a 20% decline in emissions over the next decade. Moreover, the proposed widespread adoption of EVs ignores the fact that the U.S. is already a leader in clean air, and EVs would make only a marginal impact on actual pollution levels in U.S. cities.  Continued below the Wellness ad… 

    Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs – get approved over the phone – Dr. McCullough’s company!) 🛑

    While EVs are here to stay, the Biden administration’s aggressive mandates are not only economically unsustainable but also impractical. Americans continue to drive at pre-pandemic rates, and the forced adoption of EVs poses challenges, particularly in light of the global elite’s net-zero goals, which necessitate a substantial reduction in global car ownership.

    Coercing citizens into purchasing EVs is untenable and environmentally questionable. Current subsidies and mandates are already costing Americans $22 billion annually, with the potential for a significant increase, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals. A more prudent approach would involve ending special treatment for EVs, prioritizing the American consumer, and avoiding the precipice of driving the U.S. auto industry into dire straits.

    Major Points Discussed:

    • Recent research exposes nearly $50,000 in hidden subsidies per electric vehicle (EV), funded by gasoline vehicle owners, taxpayers, and utility ratepayers.
    • Electric vehicles benefit from regulatory credits and fuel economy standards, with an unlawful 6.67 multiplier inflating their perceived efficiency, leading to unrealistic goals for widespread EV adoption by 2032.
    • Unlike gasoline vehicles with straightforward fuel pricing, charging an EV incurs additional costs due to the need for new infrastructure, placing strain on electricity grids and resulting in shared increased electricity costs of $11,833 per vehicle over a decade.
    • Direct federal and state subsidies contribute an additional $8,984 per EV over a decade, placing a substantial financial burden on American taxpayers.
    • Despite claims of EVs being crucial for climate change, their actual impact is marginal, with challenges in accurately measuring emissions and concerns about the fossil fuel-intensive production of EV batteries. The Biden administration’s aggressive EV mandates overlook more pragmatic alternatives and could lead to environmental and economic consequences.

    Biden and crew are doing everything possible to take the nation down. Nations and banks around the world are buying Gold fast and at record amounts.  Do yourself or your family a favor, check out GOLD now – Whatfinger endorses Goldco, which has helped people all over America to protect their 401Ks and retirement – get the free details –  CLICK HERE or below…

    Comments – Threads – Links

    • “I felt like I got kicked”: Ontario man told new EV battery would cost more than $50,000 Simrat Sooch of Stoney Creek, Ont., was a true believer in electric vehicles, who described his first one as “very reliable.” To trade up, he bought a pre-owned 2017 Ioniq made by Hyundai. The vehicle had already been driven 69,000 kilometres but the warranty covering the electric charging system and battery was good for 160,000 kilometres. Sooch told Global News he was confident in the purchase and figured he wouldn’t have any issues with it. But in October, a warning light appeared on his instrument panel. He took the car to the dealer, but technicians couldn’t find a problem. Two weeks later, Sooch said the vehicle stopped charging and the Ioniq was back at the dealership. After diagnostic checks, he said technicians determined the battery needed to be replaced. The quoted cost, including the battery, installation and taxes came to more than $50,000. “I felt like I got kicked in the privates,” Sooch said in an interview. Source: Global News (YouTube) – Clip at Twitter
    • Governments are shutting down power plants, while simultaneously mandating requirements for electric vehicles and all-electric houses. Is this stupidity, or an attempt to destroy civilization? – Tony Heller
    • Once you include the extraordinary cost of the half-ton battery, electric vehicles cost far more per mile to run than petrol vehicles, says Mark Ellse. – Toby Young
    • The federal government’s obsession with electric vehicles appears to be a one-way street as only 3% of government-issued vehicles are zero emission. – Rebel News Canada
    • BREAKING: Nissan is set to manufacture electric vehicles at its Sunderland plant, creating a “significant boost” for the UK automotive sector, Sky News understands. – Sky News (clip at Twitter)
    • “The transition to cleaner energy is becoming a tax break and subsidy gravy train for higher income earners and the wealthy. Hard-working taxpayers are funding all sorts of federal and state concessions for electric vehicles, solar panels and electrification of homes, while the less fortunate struggle to afford their energy bills.” Climate change brainwashing was never about saving the planet. It’s just another way to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. – Senator Rennick
    • Lithium is the “white gold” of electric vehicles — but the U.S. has a lithium supply problem. Watch the full video to learn how the U.S. fell far behind – CNBC (clip at Twitter)

    Keep Reading

    Leave A Reply

    Sponsored