Republicans Are Up To Something. Ian miles Cheong Thinks They Want War… Never ends for the Deep Staters…
In a recent move, a group of Republicans in the House and Senate, led by Sen. Rand Paul and Reps. Chip Roy and Warren Davidson, introduced a bill aimed at reaffirming that NATO’s Article 5 does not supersede Congress’s authority to declare war or authorize military force. The bill seeks to address the long-standing misconception that Article 5 obligates the United States to provide automatic military support to NATO allies in the event of an attack.
Sen. Rand Paul explained the purpose of the bill, stating that it aims to reassert that Article 5 does not negate Congress’s responsibility to make decisions regarding war and military engagements. While Article 5 establishes mutual defense commitments among NATO member states, it does not mandate immediate military intervention by the United States.
Lindsey Graham is preparing to false flag a nuclear disaster in Ukraine to trigger Article 5 and get the US directly involved with ground forces to fight against Russia. World War 3 here we come. – Ian Miles Cheong (see below)
The language of Article 5 specifies that an armed attack against a NATO member shall be considered an attack against all, and that each member has the right to individual or collective self-defense, including the use of armed force. However, Sen. Paul highlighted that military action is not explicitly required by the article. He further pointed out that Article 11 of the NATO Treaty emphasizes the need to adhere to each country’s constitutional processes when carrying out the provisions of the treaty.
From a different perspective within the GOP, some neoconservatives expressed their response to the bill. The legislation introduced by Sen. Paul and his colleagues aims to clarify that Article 5 should not override the constitutional requirement for Congress to declare war or authorize the use of military force prior to engaging in hostilities.
Graham and Blumenthal noted their resolution holds that any use of a tactical nuclear weapon by Russia, Belarus or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility that disperses radioactive contaminants into NATO territory would be viewed as an attack on NATO itself, requiring an Article V response. Graham – Senate
In the Senate, the bill was cosponsored by Sen. Mike Braun, Sen. Mike Lee, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, and Sen. Josh Hawley. Notably, Sen. Hawley, who voted against the inclusion of Sweden and Finland in NATO, explained that his vote was driven by his focus on building alliances in the Asia Pacific region, particularly due to concerns related to China. Sen. Paul, on the other hand, voted “present” on the admission of Sweden and Finland.
Lindsey Graham and Sen Blumenthal introduced a bipartisan resolution declaring russia's use of nuclear weapons or destruction of the occupied Zaporizhia Nuclear Powerplant in Ukraine to be an attack on NATO requiring the invocation of NATO Article 5 pic.twitter.com/ZhqOTXrAaQ
— GWAR69 🇩🇰🇺🇦 (@GwarWorin) June 23, 2023
In the House of Representatives, the Article 5 legislation garnered cosponsorship from Reps. Dan Bishop, Rep. Troy Nehls, Rep. Harriet Hageman, Rep. Paul Gosar, Rep. Andy Biggs, Rep. Andrew Clyde, Rep. Matt Rosendale, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Overall, this bill introduced by Republicans seeks to clarify the relationship between NATO’s Article 5 and Congress’s authority in declaring war or authorizing military force, aiming to dispel the misconception surrounding the United States’ obligations under the NATO Treaty.
Lindsey Graham (a warmonger) is preparing to false flag a nuclear disaster in Ukraine to trigger Article 5 and get the US directly involved with ground forces to fight against Russia.
“Russians are dying. Best money we’ve ever spent” pic.twitter.com/RZyNezc1kJ
— Edward G. (@realEdwardG) June 23, 2023
Major Points:
- A group of Republicans, led by Sen. Rand Paul and Reps. Chip Roy and Warren Davidson, introduced a bill in the House and Senate reaffirming that NATO’s Article 5 does not supersede congressional war powers.
- The bill aims to clarify that Article 5 does not automatically require the US to intervene militarily if a NATO ally is attacked, contrary to a common misconception.
- Sen. Rand Paul emphasized that while NATO members are obligated to assist each other in the event of an attack, military action is not explicitly mandated by Article 5.
- The legislation seeks to assert that Article 5 should not override Congress’s constitutional responsibility to declare war or authorize military force prior to engaging in hostilities.
- The bill received co-sponsorship from several Republican senators and representatives, including Sen. Mike Braun, Sen. Mike Lee, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Rep. Matt Rosendale, among others.
Want to know more?
- NATO Has No Consensus on New Secretary General Name – Biden Vetoes British Defense Minister Wallace and Danish PM Frederiksen – Stoltenberg Expected To Serve Another Term – Gateway Pundit
- BREAKING: Ukrainian Officials Blame NATO for Failed Counteroffensive – Business Insider
Biden and the Democrats Are Doing All They Can To Destroy The U.S. Military
American Gladiator: TOP 10 MEMES – Watch MAGA
