Trending
    Subscribe
    Sunday, December 22

    Controversy Unfolds: Judge’s Wife Denies Anti-Trump Twitter Allegations Amid Calls for Recusal in Ongoing Trial

    In a recent controversy surrounding the ongoing New York civil case against former President Donald Trump, the wife of Judge Arthur Engoron, Dawn Engoron, has vehemently denied accusations of running an anti-Trump Twitter account. Conservative activist Laura Loomer claimed that Dawn, under the handle @dm_sminxs, posted explicit anti-Trump content, including “FUCK TRUMP” tweets, images of Trump in an orange jumpsuit, and retweets of attacks against the former president during the trial.

    EXCLUSIVE: I have Uncovered screenshots from the X account of Dawn Marie Engoron, the wife of Leftist NYC Judge Arthur Engoron, who is overseeing the civil fraud against President Trump shows that she has been posting attacks on Trump from her account  @dm_sminxs as the trial is ongoing. This is incredible bias. Less than 24 hours ago she posted tweets in which she said “FUCK TRUMP”. She posted photoshopped pics of President Trump in an orange jump suit, she attacked me during my Live show last night for exposing her husband, and she is openly attacking President Trump’s lawyer – Laura Loomer

    Dawn Engoron refuted these allegations, stating to Newsweek, “I do not have a Twitter account. This is not me. I have not posted any anti-Trump messages.” However, questions persist about her online presence and whether she maintains an account on the platform in question.

    The controversy takes a peculiar turn as Arthur Engoron is presiding over Trump’s New York civil case, where Attorney General Letitia James accuses Trump and his organization of inflating their net worth to secure premium financing between 2011 and 2021. In September, Engoron, without a jury, ruled that Trump’s financial statements had committed fraud.  Continued below Scott Adams on topic…

    Laura Loomer, doubling down on her claims, pointed out that the suspected Twitter account is now locked. She highlighted Newsweek’s acknowledgment that they cannot definitively confirm or deny the account’s association with Arthur Engoron’s wife. Loomer also mentioned that Engoron’s son deleted his LinkedIn account after she exposed his preferential seating in the trial.

    Citing the Chief Administrative Judge’s rules in New York, Loomer argued that judges should not allow family relationships to influence their judicial conduct. She called for Engoron to recuse himself from the case due to potential bias.

    However, former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani weighed in, stating that a judge’s spouse’s social media activity alone is not sufficient grounds for disqualification. Drawing a parallel with Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who has faced scrutiny for her pro-Trump posts, Rahmani emphasized that judges must personally post something raising concerns about impartiality for recusal to be appropriate.

    There is now a Leftist attempt to run cover for Judge Engoron, his wife, and his son, all of whom I exposed this week with my investigative reporting. His wife has locked her Twitter account down and  @newsweek wrote and article with a deceptive news headline, but at the end of the article they admit they can’t definitively say this account doesn’t belong to Arthur Engoron’s wife. Which is another way of saying, “we can’t dispute Laura Loomer’s reporting”. Why did she lock her account? Because she knows this could lead to a mistrial in the case of President Trump. If it’s not his wife, why lock the account?? What does the account have to hide? People lock their accounts when they have something to hide. It’s the same reason why Arthur Engoron’s son deleted his LinkedIn account yesterday as well after I exposed him getting preferential seating from his father in the trial of President Trump. They know what I have exposed is very damning and now they are running to cover up their bad behavior.  Laura Loomer  (see tweet below) 


    Following Loomer’s reporting, conservative commentators, including former Trump administration official Richard Grenell and ex-White House communications director Mercedes Schlapp, called for a mistrial, labeling the trial a “sham.”

    The central question remains: is this a case of mistaken identity, or is Dawn Engoron concealing her online activities? The controversy adds an unexpected layer of complexity to an already contentious legal battle against the former president.

    Major Points Discussed:

    • Allegations have emerged against Dawn Engoron, wife of Judge Arthur Engoron, accusing her of running an anti-Trump Twitter account under the handle @dm_sminxs.
    • The account supposedly posted explicit anti-Trump content during the ongoing New York civil case against Donald Trump, presided over by Judge Arthur Engoron.
    • Dawn Engoron vehemently denies the accusations, stating she does not have a Twitter account and has not posted any anti-Trump messages.
    • Laura Loomer, the conservative activist making the claims, insists on potential bias and calls for Judge Engoron’s recusal, citing the Chief Administrative Judge’s rules.
    • Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani suggests that a judge’s spouse’s social media activity alone may not be sufficient grounds for disqualification, emphasizing the need for personal posts raising impartiality concerns. The controversy has sparked calls for a mistrial from conservative commentators.

    Rep Stefanik Filed the following ….

    I just filed an official judicial complaint against Judge Arthur Engoron for his inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance in New York’s disgraceful lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization. Americans are sick and tired of the blatant corruption by radical Leftist judges in NY. All New Yorkers must speak out against the dangerous weaponized lawfare against President Trump. Read my full complaint below. November 10, 2023 New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct 61 Broadway, Suite 1200 New York, New York 10006 Re:      Judicial Complaint Against Judge Arthur F. Engoron Supreme Court, New York County Case Name:    New York v. Trump Index No.:       452564/2022 Dear Commission Members: I write today to express my serious concerns about the inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance shown by Judge Arthur F. Engoron in New York’s lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization. This judge’s bizarre behavior has no place in our judicial system, where Judge Engoron is not honoring the defendant’s rights to due process and a fair trial.  continued below the Goldco Ad

    Biden and crew are doing everything possible to take the nation down. Nations and banks around the world are buying Gold fast and at record amounts.  Do yourself or your family a favor, check out GOLD now – Whatfinger endorses Goldco, which has helped people all over America to protect their 401Ks and retirement – get the free details –  CLICK HERE or below…

    These serious concerns are exacerbated by the fact that the defendant is the leading candidate for President of the United States, and it appears the judicial system is being politicized to affect the outcome of the campaign. Simply put, Judge Engoron has displayed a clear judicial bias against the defendant throughout the case, breaking several rules in the New York Code of Judicial Conduct. Last year, Judge Engoron told President Trump’s attorney that the former president is “just a bad guy” who Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James “should go after as the chief law enforcement officer of the state.”[1] At the start of the trial, Judge Engoron infamously smiled and posed for the cameras.[2] After the defendant won an appellate ruling against Judge Engoron on the appropriate statute of limitations in this case, the judge simply ignored the ruling.[3] Judge Engoron entered summary judgment against the defendant before the trial even began, without witnesses, other evidence, and cross-examination.

    ‘BIZARRE BEHAVIOR’: Elise Stefanik Formally Reprimands Far-Left Trump Judge – Trending Politics

    This, despite the fact there’s disputed material evidence–and there’s no victim of the defendant’s supposed fraud. Indeed, as the trial evidence has made clear, the defendant paid back the sophisticated Wall Street banks, on time, in full, with interest, as agreed.[4] No insurance company paid a penny. And these banks and insurance companies, supposedly defrauded, continue to do business with the defendant. Yet Judge Engoron decreed before trial the defendant somehow committed fraud. Now, the judge is holding a trial–with no jury–to determine how much of Tish James’ requested $250 million in damages–with no victims–he will extract from the defendant. How does this not violate the defendant’s Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial? And Judge Engoron has made it crystal clear he doesn’t care what the defendant or his attorneys have to say. Indeed, Judge Engoron illegally gagged them. Judge Engoron told the defendant: “We are not here to listen to what you have to say.”   Continued below the Covid ad… 

    Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs – get approved over the phone – Dr. McCullough’s company!) 🛑

    He told the defendant’s counsel: “I am not here to hear what he has to say, now sit down!” And Judge Engoron even threatened the defendant’s counsel if he filed a routine motion for a directed verdict: “You better not, Chris!” Judge Engoron and his staff are partisan Democrat donors. As recently as 2018, Judge Engoron donated to the Manhattan Democrats[5]–even though Section 100.5 says that judges “shall refrain” from “making a contribution to a political organization.”[6] Section 100.5 also stipulates that a “judge shall prohibit members of the judge’s staff” from contributing more than $500 “in the aggregate during any calendar year to all political campaigns for political office.”[7] Allison Greenfield has served as Judge Engoron’s principal law clerk since 2019.[8] In both 2022 and 2023, Greenfield donated in excess of $500 to political campaigns. In 2022 alone, Greenfield donated “$3,335 in political donations to Democrat candidates and causes.”[9] She’s already given more than $1,000 in 2023 to campaigns.[10] When President Trump’s attorneys notified Judge Engoron, Judge Engoron responded by issuing an illegal gag order against President Trump’s legal team.[11] Judge Engoron has gone on to gag and fine President Trump for merely criticizing Judge Engoron’s law clerk, which is core political speech protected by the First Amendment.[12]

    If anyone in America must have the constitutional right to speak out against the judge, his staff, the witnesses, or the process, it’s a defendant going through a process he believes is politicized and weaponized against him. To gag a defendant is un-American. It’s an illegal prior restraint on the defendant’s First Amendment rights, which even the progressive ACLU felt compelled to acknowledge after another Democrat judge–D.C. Obama U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan–illegally gagged President Trump.[13] Indeed, three Democrat-appointed judges on the D.C. Circuit have since stayed Judge Chutkan’s illegal gag order.[14] Judge Engoron put his judgment in serious doubt by issuing a summary judgment citing as evidence of fraud that the Trump Organization said Mar-a-Lago is worth between $426 and $612 million.[15] The Associated Press reported that two top Palm Beach-area real estate agents said that the club’s “sale of a billion dollars or more would be possible.”[16] In fact, Judge Engoron ridiculously found Mar-a-Lago was only worth somewhere between $18 and $27.6 million. Any Zillow.com search shows that nearly 20 acres of prime real estate in Palm Beach, touching both the Atlantic Ocean and the intracoastal waterway, is worth exponentially more than $18 and $27.6 million.   Continued below the Zelenko Ad

    And Judge Engoron had in his hand the sworn deposition of Palm Beach real estate agent Lawrence Moens, who said the Trump Organization’s valuations were “reasonable and below my estimate for the market value of the property each year.”[17] Moens was asked in his sworn deposition about what sort of buyers would purchase Mar-a-Lago, and Moens responded: “I could dream up anyone from Elon Musk to Bill Gates and everyone in between. Kings, emperors, heads of state. But with net worths in the multiple billions.”[18] The judge wrote: “Obviously this Court cannot consider an ‘expert affidavit’ that is based on unexplained and unsubstantiated ‘dream[s].’”[19] Judge Engoron apparently doesn’t understand that expert opinions aren’t “dreams.” And this is yet another example why Judge Engoron demonstrated bad judgment by keeping this case, instead of sending it to the expert judges in the Commercial Division where it belongs.[20] Judge Engoron’s bizarre and biased behavior is making New York’s judicial system a laughingstock.

    Former Southern District of New York federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, who has at times criticized President Trump, recently stated that he views the “whole New York justice system” as “fraudulent.”[21] Section 100.2(A) states: “A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”[22] Judge Engoron has grossly failed to do this. The Commission’s sanctions against Judge Engoron are necessary to bring back credibility to our great state’s legal system. All Americans, including political opponents, must receive due process and equal protection under our U.S. and New York Constitutions. Judge Engoron’s disdain for President Trump and his politics are evident, and the Commission must take corrective action to restore a just process and protect our constitutional rights. Judge Engoron must recuse from this case.

    This case is so much bigger than President Donald J. Trump. If Judge Engoron can railroad a billionaire New York businessman, a former President of the United States, and the leading presidential candidate, just imagine what he could do to all New Yorkers. Judge Engoron’s lawlessness sends an ominous and illegal warning to New York business owners: If New York judges don’t like your politics, they will destroy your business, the livelihood of your employees, and you personally. This Commission cannot let this continue. Thank you for your prompt consideration of this judicial complaint against Judge Arthur F. Engoron for his inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance in New York v. Trump (452564/2022).

    Comments – Threads

    • “Judge Arthur Engoron has displayed a ‘clear judicial bias’ against Trump and broken ‘several rules’ in the state’s judicial conduct code, Stefanik wrote in a letter to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct.”  Funkytown
    • Cheers to @EliseStefanik for filing an ethics complaint against New York Judge Arthur Engoron. He’s a partisan clown. This is so much bigger than Trump. This Democrat lawfare and election interference is a grave danger to our Republic. It must end. – Mike Davis

    James Kravitz – Freelance Writer – Whatfinger News

    It Can Happen Here: TOP 10 MEMES – Watch MAGA

     

    Keep Reading

    Leave A Reply

    Sponsored